300124 ED And Opposition Politicians

 ED And Opposition Politicians 

        The fiasco about ED and Jharkhand CM Soren is another extreme non-compatibility in the world's largest democracy. Government Agencies are supposed to promote 'SuRaj and SuShashan' but here these are coxed to fulfill vested interested/ And that too in the election season motivations. If these Agencies get into action with vested interests, these are very likely to be bribed and prepped up with rewards like chairs, control, cash and cuties. Doesn't that count into unlawful practices with respect to elections? I mean if that is not so then even the politicians can dole out cash, chairs, control and cuties well before it starts becoming illegal! In such a case, elections would only become farcical. Imagine that and we boast of the world's largest democracy.

          But what is worse is the incident of Jharkhand CM and other native leaders. The CM didn't have faith in ED's action or whatever, he went to his hometown to Organize his Party. And the Government is seizing his BMW car (or his valuables in his absence), enforcing 'Dhara 144' around CM's Office and other drastic actions. The Jharkhand CM is native Indian and in spite of being a CM, doesn't have any faith in ED and Police would work against his authority to enforce '144'. 

         In my opinion, native CMs should have been like crown princes of their states in 'Swaraj India' then what Government authority and which actions are being investigated? Are these authorized and supervised by the King at the Center? Or let me ask in another format - who is the King at the center in the 'Swaraj India' Rule? Or will the Rulers prop up in front of the masses and proclaim that they don't adhere to the 'Swaraj India' philosophy and instead they would arrest native leaders and princes and make India a slave nation again?

         But what is worse is that the answers to these questions never come out open in front of everyone. They always indulge in hoodwinking a few top notch and befool them and befool the nation through them by displaying them online and approving their acts. It is no coincidence that the ED action comes quickly after the 'Nitish Kumar' incident related to Bihar. The Bosses of ED felt that the 'kEy to Government and Control would go to the Rightful KEY-Man and so they hastily moved the ED office upon two plans - (1) About Lallu family in Bihar who may be coercing in kEy politics and (2) The Jharkhand CM who may be the prime object on the KEY-Man's side. 

         If that is so, then does it mean that :

    (i) the ED is working against Rightful Ruler,

  (ii) the ED is working against the KEY-Man and annex his Rights and Authority. Is this what E and C philosophies are? In such a case, does their use of force of Government Authority and Governmental Guns comply with A, B, C, D, E etc. philosophies. 

  (iii) By not complying with 'Swaraj', do we infer that the ED can be actually formed of 'Bahari Log', that is invaders of historical years and other external operators settled in India during the British Raj. (I wonder why ED was always in favor with Congress Rulers and their Stalwarts of External origins and then with those who opposed Indian Monarchs).

   (iv) By acting hot in the heels of the 'Nitish Kumar' incident, does the ED and their Bosses (whoever they are) unintentionally express their opposition to it?

    (v) By the two actions that followed, is the ED dividing the Native people into separate groups and Control the masses with mutual feuds and weakening by dividing (British divide and rule policy).

    (vi) By not working for 'Swaraj' and depriving the native people off their 'swaraj', their Rights and their goodies of their nation and subverting the elected CMs of a state (or princes of any state), are the ED and their Bosses attempting to cause a 'Civil disorder and War' in India or cunningly continue ransacking India with foreign powers.

         No wonder why other people keep quite while ED Bosses chooses their targets mainly from the Natives and also a few from the externals to give themselves an 'honesty and equality' tag.

        In 1977, this very land catapulted the revolution and were befooled, subverted and pushed into darkness by these very Bosses and they sprang up naked into their action hot on the heels of the 'Nitish Kumar' as if their 43 years of cookies were exposed farcical and unlicensed. Do they realize that even 76 years of bluffs are exposed, 110 years of annexation are stark naked, 165 years of tyranny and non-compliance with Law are staked and two world wars are to be explained. What is ED enlightened about and why are they charged with power to thrust into this land? The world is facing Ukraine war, Gaza fighting, Yemen onslaught, Taiwan-China and North Korea-South Korea threats, the Armymen have a lot to ponder about and the Nation has to stand united. We cannot allow 'Bahari Log' to cause nuisance in our Nation. Hence, just as any native leader, ED too has to show up their faces, their Bosses and appease the people of their correctness and honesty towards the nation and the 'Swaraj' philosophy. ED too has a moral obligation to not to befool the people and adhere to KEY-Man laws and principles. The ED has to prove to the people that they are not part of cooking kEy philosophies or cooking swapping of identities to suit their needs and cunningness. Afterall no can be reliable except the real Owner, more so about the custody of the Nation or even the States, Jharkhand and Bihar, in this case.   IPYadav

220124 Ram Ram

 

RAM RAM 

Maybe the world will be indicated that Hindus are boasting power after annexing the site for Ram Janmbhoomi, but we should enlighten them that Hinduism is very ancient and resurrection of our ancient sites is a mode of honoring our ancestors.  IPYadav

150123 Ram Mandir And The Political Parties

 150123  Ram Mandir And The Political Parties

            Ram Mandir Pran Pratishttha is scheduled for the 22nd of this month and invitations have been sent to various political persons. But being an outcome of a political endeavor, it has a history of those who stood 'For' it and those who stood 'Against' it. Here, let me repeat, I have used the terms of 'For and Against' which are inherent in any debated topic and I have not used the term 'Opposing it'.

         Well, as for those who were opposing it, the ceremony wouldn't be any matter of attendance, but those who were 'Against' the issue, the eventual result should be as amicably acceptable as a team loosing a match. But finally all assemble together, party together and play together. Similarly, Lord Ram is for everyone and everyone can assemble together and celebrate together, only the winning team has to extend the invitation to the loosing team. 

         Also, considering that Ayodhya can only accommodate the selected invitees, the Organizers can consider the option to call those who don't or cannot join this day for this event, on another day in the name of another ceremony for them. This way, they can patch up the differences and ill-emotions on both sides and start an atmosphere of true Ram-Raj.

            It would also signify that the Hindu paksh truly believes in humanity, honesty, equality and amicability towards all.    IPYadav

130124 Greetings For Lohri, Sankrant And New Year

 Greetings For Lohri, Sankrant And New Year 

            Greetings to you all for Lohri and Sankrant and the auspicious day for the new crop and new year.

               For years on, we have been following the traditions every year and celebrating the centuries old events as our auspicious beginnings of new years and new crops, even though the original dates of these schedules have shifted over again and again. Why do we adhere to these dates and these feelings? 

                     And then, why should we forget our Hindu traditions, places of worships, idols of worships and treasures of fond memories in our independent nation and adopt the shame and destructive acts of foreign Rulers and their tribes? Doesn't matter if they are Mughals or other Muslim Rulers or Sikandar or Changez Khan or Nadir Shah or the Britishers or the recurring 'Brahma-astra type acts', they only annexed power during the century old political drama by posing as Indians as well as foreign Ruler kingpins. So much so that they aided a conspiracy of defuncting the Rights and Authorities of Native Rulers with these dual identities and making a mess of everything political and of national interests, purposefully and cunningly falsified the facts and defrauded the native Indians who loitered around in their independent and free nation like blindfolded asses.

                 How many in today's India would stand up and say that they even manipulated the constitution to suit their needs and then they manipulated political explanations to exempt themselves from following this very constitution and make merry with their fraudulent acts as some kind of their rightful ways in this same country, same society. And for this, they placed a Policing Authority that would apply constitutional requirements upon native Indians and way of Rule exemptions for their followers, thus making all their illegal acts, exigencies, allowances, reservations, etc. as some kind of 'licensed acts'. 

                     But licenses were supposed to be limited by their own constitutions and licenses were supposed to end with 'Swaraj' and then with Numero Uno Rule, but did they stop? No. Assuming they made mistakes, did they admit their mistakes and submitted themselves to Justice and pay back for all their wrongs? No. Then on what consideration did Mahatma Gandhi allow them to stay back in 1947 and on what correctness and consideration did the Congressmen for 50s and 60s allowed them to spread into the Indian Government, carried out acts like Hindi-Chini Bhai Bhai, etc. then got backfired with 1962 and 1965 wars.

                  Or should I say that the victory in World War II had gone into the heads of the NATO and they themselves cunningly and shrewdly kept their kingpins into the Government and their tribes in control of the Nation. Then this tactic was adopted by Congressmen to enable Nehru family Rule in India. This means, all the time they were conspiring to demean and defunct native Rulers and all this was done very secretly, very cunningly!. Does this also indicate why Mahatma Gandhi, with his clout and national following, purposely held these foreign tribes back in India and used them to collectively wield power upon isolated innocent Indians. If he was a part of all this, then I will say that he was no sacred soul (Mahatma) as we have been told by these leaders.

                    But just like so many other online stories, these also hang in limbo while we are fed falsified facts every now and then by these Foreign Indos.

                      On the Sankranti, may your (natives and brethren) lives be reinvigorated with new esteem and belief in Justice of the Almighty. So charge yourself with new energy for the Sankranti.   IPYadav